More Feminist bullshit!

Disclaimer: I don't care if I offend you with this.  You can't say anything without offending someone, and unless you want to explain why you were offended and try to change my mind, I don't care.

A friend of mine just linked me to an article on The Huffingon Post that made my brain hurt.  If you didn't click it (and if you don't want your brain to hurt, I'd recommend not doing so), it's about a woman dating a feminist man.  I'm not horribly fond of feminism, so it shouldn't be hard to figure out what I think of the article as a whole, but fuck this was bad.  I'll break down what I think of the post in the following paragraphs based on the points she made in the article

1.) He knows your body is yours, but at this point that's not an achievement.
That's not too surprising at this point in time.  A lot of men understand that women's bodies are their own, and women understand the same thing.  You don't have to be a feminist to figure that out.  As a question, though, what if you were making a legitimately stupid decision with your body and a man told you it might be a bad idea?  Would he be a misogynist for not letting you go in without a second opinion on this?  Like if you wanted to tattoo a dick on your forehead, for example.  Not the best idea, and you'd be left with (at least) a scar for the rest of your life.  Some women are stupid and will get this stupid shit done to themselves.  Note that I said some.  Some men are likely just as stupid.  Would a man be misogynistic if they didn't want you to go through with that, though?

2.) Gender stereotypes work for some people.  Some women like being housewives, some don't.  Deal with it.
I'm not going to say everyone wants to go with it, or that everyone should go with it, but it works for a lot of people.  Those lot of people should be able to make that choice without being degraded by you.  I know that sounds slightly oxymoronic, since I am currently insulting this woman, but she doesn't want to be insulted.  If you judge people, expect to be judged.  I know I expect to be, and I don't give a shit.  Try to change my mind and I'll be happy to listen (no sarcasm there).

3.) Making sexist jokes makes you about as much of a sexist as making racist jokes makes you a racist.
People will make jokes at anyone's expense.  It's a thing.  Someone who doesn't usually got raised saying that minorities or people who are treated unfairly are so burdened by their current situation that someone making a joke at their expense would completely collapse their psyche.  I'm sorry, it doesn't work that way.  People get offended by jokes because they have a hard time controlling their own emotions.  I'm not saying there aren't truly offensive jokes out there that push the edge a little too much, but just change the damn channel.  If the only people the comedian appeals to is the KKK, they'll be losing their fanbase fast.  Refusing to tell a joke because the butt of the joke is a person who's in the minority is essentially saying they're too weak to handle the joke.  It's insulting, in my opinion.

4.) It breeds, eh?
There are generally enough inequalities between the genders nowadays that we have to deal with about he same amount of shit.  Women, go put your name on the Selected Services form and dish out an equal amount of child support relative to your pay.  Also, start smelling repulsive.  Men have inequalities, too.  Also, the fact that he's instilling the knowledge that his daughter can do anything into his daughter is standard, not specific to feminist men.  It's a thing parents tell their children all the time (even if they don't mean it and just really really want them to be a doctor).  Also, being wise beyond your years is your perception.  Your grandparents probably thought you were wise beyond your years because you stopped drooling before your parents did.  This is also accompanied by a .gif that says "Who run the world? GIRLS!"  If you want women to run the world instead of men, then you're sexist towards men.  I'm not saying men or women should exclusively run the world, since women are better than men at some things and vice versa.  You need both or you'll get fucked.  Not in the good way, either.

5.) He's passionate about women's rights?  Good for him.  Tell him to get my name off the selected services or put yours on it.
People who are passionate about one thing tend to be blind to opposing viewpoints.  This section leads to two different articles about female... things?  One about how Massachusetts has an oversight in their laws about taking upskirt pictures of women, and the other about how some woman got elected as a democratic nominee for something or other.  I'd like to say that no one who isn't taking the pictures agrees with the first one.  I'm not a feminist and I don't, mostly because I view consent as the most important thing in any situation.  If pictures got published online of someone, did they want the pictures to be put online?  If not, then it's wrong.  Even if they consented to having the pictures taken, they didn't consent to having them distributed.  On the second one, remember Hillary Clinton?  Yeah, the one who said the crazy shit about women were the primary victims of war?  She was a presidential candidate, too.  Question, though, I wonder if she's all for the men who have wives in the military who wind up getting stuck raising their kid.  You know, the single dads out there who could really use some help?  Those exist, too.

6.) Nobody gives a shit if you like being tied up and spanked, woman.
Well, maybe a couple of people, but not most people.  I'm wondering if she asked her husband if she could post details about their sex life on the Huffington Post, though.  If not, then you don't really deserve the first point.

7.) Because women and men have absolutely no biological differences.
Women don't have tits, neither do men.  Men and women both have the exact same genitals and appear physically similar beyond being bipedal, having arms, and a face.  We're different and inherently unequal, but that inequality isn't a bad thing.  We shouldn't walk around the world being completely blind to the differences we have as people.  Not all women are the same, and neither are all men.  I don't think that these differences should warrant different treatment, but they shouldn't be outright ignored.  Hell, could you imagine what the world would be like if we weren't allowed to point out any differences in anyone?  There are no descriptions of someone who just robbed you.  Suddenly that six foot tall white male with short hair becomes "A person".  Suddenly your 5'8'' wife with gorgeous blonde hair, nice tits, and amazing curves becomes "the human being you sleep with on a regular basis".  We're all different in many ways including our genders, and being blind to genders just cuts one more thing out of the equation.  I think in terms of decision making that could affect the person's life in a way that will extend for a while (i.e. choosing how much they deserve to be paid) should be made not based on who they are, but how well they do their work.  It's not like the head CEOs of any company are going to fuck the hourly employee, anyway.

That being said, I do think women and men should be treated equally.  If law mandates that one gender has to do it, so does the other, or no gender.  If a couple gets divorced, I think both parents should be judged equally based on their life, since a crackhead mother will probably be a worse parent than a Walmart cart pushing dad.  If the dad winds up with the child, then the mother should have to pay an equal amount of child support to them.  Equal based on pay, of course.  Nobody should have to pay $750 in child support when they only make $1,000 a month just because their significant other makes $4,000 a month.  These numbers may be off, I'm not a lawyer and have no intention of becoming one.

Fred Phelps is Dead. It's okay to be happy, but nothing will change.

I saw the news report earlier today that Fred Phelps died.  I don't care all that much (yet I'm writing about it), but I have to say that nothing's going to change.  That's like saying that Christianity died off with Jesus.  The church will probably continue their picketing at military, gay-rights activists, and gay people's funerals.  His family will miss him, and they'll probably take a week off.  I've also heard that he was excommunicated (need verification, not looking for it, I don't care) from the Westboro church.  That kind of reminds me when the KKK supposedly told them to cool their tits on all of this shit.  It seems like he'd gotten so hateful that the hategroup he founded didn't even want him anymore.  Also, can I say that I hope someone pickets his funeral?  I just want to see the look on his family's face when they get that shit.

I also find it kind of funny that on the Huffington Post article about his death they're not having a "FUCK YES!" reaction to this.  So many people hated him, and now that he's dead people are forgiving him.  Mostly so they don't "stoop to his level" and hate other people.  I don't see why they care.  They picketed funerals where, I'd assume, the families were grieving their loss.  These are people, not just a person, who care about a family's grief only so that they can make it worse for no good reason.  I know I said I wish they'd picket his funeral, but that's both sarcastic and my love of irony.  I have no true concern for the man, or his family.  He was a terrible man in life, and in death his legacy will be remembered for a while at the very least.  The funeral comments aren't unexpected, regardless of what I said.  They did the same thing with Michael Jackson, and probably with Hitler (I'm only 20, I don't remember this.)  Either way, he's dead, the church will continue, and it's fine to feel good about it.

Moderately Irrelevant Topics!

So, it's already been a long while since I've posted here, mostly because I've been saving some of these for my podcast.  That podcast still hasn't started, so I'll just talk about them here.

For those of you who haven't heard yet (all four of you who actually read this), there was a new Christian movie that came out.  It was about three weeks ago or so, I think.  That's when I heard about it.  It's a movie about how some kids want to start a Bible group in their school, and they were refused because they couldn't get a teacher to back them or something.  My only question about the movie is where it would happen, because I've never heard of this happening in real life.  The US Christian population in 2013 was 77 percent.  That's almost 8 out of 10 people.  When would this happen?

Onto the real topic that actually happened, though.  Two atheist teenagers wanted to start a secular club in their school.  They didn't feel like they fit in anywhere, so they wanted to make a place where they could fit in.  Solving a problem they saw.  The school's principal told them no, because the group... wouldn't fit in.  Yeah.  They didn't feel like they fit in, and were told no when they wanted to make a place to fit in because that place wouldn't fit in.  I'm not sure whether or not that sentence made sense, but that train of thought makes my brain hurt.  That thought process makes no sense.  That's like telling a few D&D nerds in high school that they can't play D&D after school because they don't fit in during school.  The two siblings who requested the group then contacted the Secular Student Alliance (SSH) and told them about the problem.  The SSH then wrote a letter to the school telling the principal to let them have the group, which he ignored.  Then the ACLU got involved and the superintendent said to let them have the club.  You don't fuck with the ACLU, from what I've seen.

Now, one would think that after contacting the ACLU and getting the stamp of approval from the superintendent, they'd have their club.  Nope.  The community has rallied together to stop these heathen people from making a club where people don't believe in the almighty God!  This is a crock of shit.  She's gotten several threats, as well as people calling her Satan and such, so she doesn't feel safe starting the club.  A civil rights victory turned into a bullying case that didn't even get nearly the media attention that the Amanda Todd case did.  If you google the topic itself you get a ton of articles about how they won, but I haven't found one about they lost yet.  Yeah, I still can't.  Did this paragraph even happen?  It seems like it would.  Yeah, I'm not sure this part happened.  I've tried twenty or so searches, and I've gotten nothing in the first two pages of any of them.  And yes Amanda Todd is perfectly relevant to this discussion.

I find it strange that we're talking about bullying so much here, yet when shit like this might have happened, there's nothing. HAHA!  Finally found it, and this did happen.  She was called a dumb cunt bitch, as well as Satan by a Christian girl.  She was also fearful for her family.  All of the donations to the two teens were returned, and the group didn't even have its first meeting.  This Kalei Wilson character does look like she's up to no good, though.  That innocent smile, and her completely colorful clothing sure is suspicious.

What the fuck is wrong with people?

Jobs and Speculation.

    Can I get away with one more bitching about the baby boomers?  Then again, I don't actually remember if I posted anything about them on here.  They're a pretty easy group to bitch about, so I probably have.  Either way, they've been pissing me off lately.  From what I can tell from a ten second google search, most of these people, if not all of them, are retired.  Why, then, do they assume to know everything about the current job market, as well as their current standards for looks?  From what I recall, not many jobs really care all that much outside of McDonalds not allowing beards.  Someone told me they don't allow that, anyway.  Health reason, though.  Other than that, I've seen men with hair down to their ass, graphic t-shirts, and long beards.  Granted, you can't go on facebook and spew racist shit and expect to keep your job.  Hell, even Gilbert Gottfried got fired from his job as the Aflac duck for saying something or other on twitter or some other social media website.  They hired a stand-up comedian who's known for saying offensive shit, and fired him for saying offensive shit.  Makes sense.  But, for the most part, the higher-up jobs (anything that requires a college degree) don't really care as long as you're clean.  This is all speculation, mind you, but I've seen people who look like stoners working in pretty good jobs within these fields, so I can only assume that they care more about you being easy to work with than you wearing a t-shirt with the angel of death on it while growing your hair down to your ankles.  Speculation's fun, isn't it?  It's a nice hobby of mine.

The hell?

I'm wondering something.  I'm finding that I'm getting views from random websites.  Hell, about two years ago I got one from a youtube video about GTA.  Just now I checked, and I'm getting views from a porn website.  I'm still not sure why either of these are happening.  Anyone else having this happen?  It's not annoying, it's just... weird.

I'm back!

     And good lord did I miss a shitload of opportunities to sell my soul to the media for a few extra views.  I don't remember what I've been doing during this break, to be honest.  It involved video games, I know that much.  It seems like a pretty common break reason for a lot of people, but it's been about a year and a half.  This is a bit insane.  There was a lull in the news, though, and I didn't have much to write about.  Then life hit, I guess, and I stopped writing.  Actually, I just lost internet for a while.  I'm not sure if this counts as "life hitting", but whatever.  But, new computer, new goals, new everything and so on.  If I hear something interesting in the news I'll be commenting on it.  Wait!  There was something interesting rather recently!

     Ted Nugent has been causing a pretty nice uproar in the media lately, and Bill Mahar commented on it.  Yes, the old fuck is commenting on the old fuck.  What I'm going to be commenting on, though, isn't politics.  Kind of related, but not completely.  Teddy called Obama a sub-human mongrel.  Or Mongol, I can't understand what these people are saying about him.  It was probably mongrel.  Bad pronunciation aside, everyone's accusing him of being racist because of this comment.  First off, he is.  And he probably said this primarily because Obama's black.  Well, half black.  Someone could, in fact, call Obama a sub-human mongrel and not be racist for it.  Not every insult directed at anyone with some small amount of blackness in them is because they're a shade of gray.  Saying something negative about a black person doesn't automatically mean you hate all black people, it just means that this specific black person was doing something worth commenting on.  Sometimes this is in a positive manner, but most of the time it's not.  That or we just take more note of the negative, which seems to be the general feel of this population.  I'd like to state this yet again: I'm not defending ol' Teddy.  Can't stand the old fuck.  I don't like country music much, and the guy's got scrambled eggs for brains.  I'm only defending what he says and how it doesn't automatically make someone a racist if they say something negative about a black person.

     Now let's move on to less relevant things.  I started writing a book since the last time you guys saw me.  It's a fantasy/sci-fi book, and it's up for free on wattpad.  Because advertising to an extremely small group of people always boosts page views by at least 400x the original amount.
     Another thing is that I won't be following a set schedule.  I will try to make these things at least a day apart, though.  I do have a few ideas floating around in my head right now.  I figure it's better to stretch content out than it is to stretch for content.  I don't unsubscribe from people on YouTube because they don't upload enough, I do it because their blacksmithing channel turned into a My Little Pony orgy.  Or because their content just started to suck.  Usually the second one.
     On another note of complete irrelevancy, 100 posts has just been made.  I'm a total badass.

Hardcore Parkour

Am I the only person sick of seeing ''parkour'' being thrown around any time a custom map or a game has anything involving jumping and possibly dying?  That's not parkour, that's platforming.  Last I checked there were only a few games that actually involved parkour.  There's one MMO parkour game that I know of called FreeJack, and another single-player story based game called Mirror's Edge.  I've only played those two, so I'm not sure about others, but it's fucking annoying to hear people call platforming parkour.  Parkour is getting from A to B as quickly as you can without wasting energy.  Platforming is jumping between platforms.  Period.  Fuck.  You.

Pop Punk.

To my knowledge, this is an oxymoron.  I've always thought that punk was supposed to be underground, and pop means it's popular.  That may have been stating the obvious, but I feel the need to, as we're apparently too stupid to realize that punk is functionally incapable of being pop.  Punk is supposed to be against everything mainstream, not be mainstream.  It may seem like I'm dragging this on, but fuck, that's one of the biggest oxymora I can think of.  The only one that's music related I can think of is soft rock.  Rock is supposed to be hard, that's why they called it rock in the first place.  Metal is supposed to be a harder form of rock, as it is in a real-world context.  Hard rock and soft rock don't exist.  There is Rock, there is Metal, and there's pussy music.  Most of you people listen to the latter of that group.

Adult Language

Over the years I've noticed that there are words that are considered adult language.  Now I'm curious as to why they're considered to be for adults when we condemn those adults who use them.  If adults can't use them since they'd be considered immature if they did, why shouldn't children be able to use them?  Aren't children known for being immature?  If so, then why can't they use language made for immature adults?  I'm confused on this one.  I mean, I would be considered immature if I said fuck every now and again, but I'd be punished as a child if I said the same thing at the same rate.  I don't understand the logic behind that.  That coupled with the fact that most adults want to be kids again really boggles me.  If they want to be kids you'd assume they'd be using immature language more often than they do now.  But they don't.  They condemn the people who use it as immature, and I don't see why they would.  Contradictory and possibly hypocritical, if you ask me.

Women's Strength

I'm sick of these posts popping up everywhere.  I'm sure I can't be the only one.  The posts about how strong women are because they wear heels, can carry a baby, etcetera, etcetera.  I'm sorry if I can't carry a baby, but I can wear high heels.  I choose not to because I think it's stupid for anyone to wear them.  They're badly designed most of the time and fuck your feet up miserably.  Then they say that they're strong because they can burn their foreheads with curling/straightening irons and not give it a second thought.  Again, this strength is caused by superficial bullshit that shouldn't be done in the first place.  Half the women spend three hours straightening their hair because they don't want it curly, and the other half curl it because they don't want it straight.  Why should we bother doing this?  Both hairstyles are equally good looking in today's society, so why even bother picking?  Then there's the make-up deal, which is even worse.  They regularly spend money on things to make themselves look 'prettier' when they don't even have to bother.  Poor women buy these things, at that, which is even worse.  But, even worse than that whole shit storm is when they say they can cry themselves to sleep and then pretend it didn't happen.  Why should this be used to state strength?  Hasn't crying been used to show weakness since the beginning of recorded history?  Granted, the recovery is more important than the mistake, but still.  We shouldn't allow this to be thrown around since men can do it to.  Some of us do, at that.  Most of us just realize about thirty seconds in that we can just as easily do something more productive with our time than cry.  Why should women be awarded for this while men are frowned upon for it?  Then again, it could be some sort of revenge, since men are allowed to fuck anything that walks and be considered a king, while if women do it they're considered a slut.  I frown upon both equally, though.